🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.