🔗 Share this article

In a notable regulatory appeal, a national review panel has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the regulator petitioned the review board to officially classify the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the regulator to order platforms to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted widespread discussion". X drew a parallel between the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board revised the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the board held a contrary view, contending the video was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, X welcomed the decision.

"X fought this decision to uphold free speech and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material being displayed to users who are minors".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the content were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been advised to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.